An analysis of Mr. Staudenmaier as "Protocol
of Steiner" forger and the stages in his efforts to cover up his untruthfulness
as self-proclaimed "historical scholar" (part IX)
(Continued from here)
For more comments on the carelessness with which
Mr. Staudenmaier writes about the "lecture" and lecture series by Steiner,
that he "describes" as starting point to and foundation stone of his initial
writings on anthroposophy, and his way of describing Hans Mändl as
a source for the title of the alleged "lecture", see another
posting on it to the WC-list.
For a comment on the confused way Mr. Staudenmaier
projects a hierarchical view of the relation between races, dominant during
the first part of the 20th century in the West, on to anthroposophy, see
here.
For more on the way the "Protocol of Steiner" mythology,
to which Mr. Staudenmaier tries to contribute, is used as one of the mythologies
about Rudolf Steiner and Waldorf education, cultivated by PLANS, see here.
For more on some of the historical and conceptual
background of the demagogical campaigns and writings of Mr. Staudenmaier
and PLANS, see here.
(Go to the beginning
of this analysis and documentation of Mr. Staudenmaier as "Protocol of
Steiner" forger.) |